Look at the unprecedented forest fires — that mainly burn down homes — in California, Canada, Australia, Africa etc. I have taken a measured response to this, emphasizing diminishing forest management over the years as a primary “culprit.” But I do not discount the real possibility that this is being accelerated by the use of Geoengineering, Chemtrails, Directed Energy Weapons, HAARP and possibly technologies that we don’t even know about.
All of these things are documented. Bill Gates and others are now openly discussing the idea “chemtrailing” the upper atmosphere with Sulfur Dioxide in order to cool the planet. I’m not making any of this up. There is also a very odd parallel between the UN’s Wildland’s project — to concentrate populations in dense urban centers — and the areas getting burned. We have seen that both in California and more recently in Australia.
These fires are unprecedented.
This article correlates the ongoing fires in Australia with the UN’s Agenda21/Agenda2030 just as others have previously made the same correlation between the CA fires and the UN’s Agenda21/Agenda2030.
I no longer think this is mere conspiracy theory — more like Inconvenient Globalist Truths. And while I don’t know if this is what is going on what I do know is that the Global Corporate Media will not engage the Open Source Independent Journalists to sort out truth from fiction. They merely refuse to engage in the discourse.
Australian Bushfires: A Smart City Conspiracy?
December 5, 2019 | 9 Comments
Here is one link on the subject of the Wildlands Project. Do your own research. There is much more on this subject that you could find through Google or other search engines.
United Nations and the Wildlands Project
Posted June 2016
In this 1952 Military film they talk about the use of Biological and Chemical Warfare to attain 2 main objectives:
1) Destroy our enemies food production
2) Incapacitate our enemies
So here we are 67 years later and the progress of technological advance has been exponential. And during that time energy weapons — like those I mention above — are now added to the arsenal of biological and chemical weapons of the 1950’s.
Back then — as today — our main enemy always seems to be “Russia, Russia, Russia.” . . . with little talk about China, Islamic Supremacists etc. But many smart people are beginning to wonder if the new enemy might just by YOU and I. Just something to think about. And 5G uses the same frequencies used by the military as weapons to be used against “the enemy.” In fact, as I have already covered, the US military has used these technologies already. Could be they are now using them on us?
So as these military weapons — 5G antennas — go up in our neighborhoods perhaps we should at least consider that we may actually be the new enemy. I do hope I’m wrong about this. I’m sure many of these other smart people feel the same. But I can no longer discount the possibility. It could be that our elites now see many of us as the “new enemy.” Just consider a few facts:
* The 4th Industrial Revolution is expected to eliminate 50% of all remaining jobs in the next 20-30 years. The elite no longer needs so many of us.
* Entitlements (Social Security and Medicare) are expected to swallow up most Federal Revenue in the next 30 years. The sooner we die the less the burden. And there has been talk about cutting back entitlements for years now. They know that any further cuts will not be to the fat — but to the bone. Furthermore they know we will resist. Just look at what is going on in France right now as the Yellow Vest fight against cuts in entitlements and pensions. Soon this will be happening in the US and Canada.
And we have repeated this mistake many times in human history: to forget the evil lurking among our elites as they look upon us as “useful idiots” or “useless eaters.”
Just a few examples:
* The Jewish Holocaust under Hitler: fully supported by US Corporations and the Bush family.
* The Armenian Holocaust in Turkey
* Mao’s Cultural Revolution (60 million dead)
* Pol Pot in Cambodia
* The Vatican’s Spanish Inquisition
* The burning of witches . . . even though there are no witches [LOL]
* The Bolshevik Revolution in Russia
* The US funded rise of ISIS in Iraq and Syria
This is not a mistake we want to repeat. Just saying.
This film will first show what the Navy is planning for the offensive employment of biological and chemical warfare.
Biological and chemical warfare have two principal objectives. To reduce the enemy’s production of food by destroying his crops, and his food producing farm animals, and to incapacitate the enemy’s armed forces, and that portion of his human population that directly supports them.
The Navy is preparing to accomplish these objectives with both biological and chemical agents. The Department of Defense has assigned primary responsibility to the chemical core US Army. Including the basic research in biological and chemical agents and their production in the quantities needed by the joint services.
The Navy therefore is primarily concerned with delivery of these agents to the areas ordered for contamination and the dispersion of the agents in such form and concentration as to accomplish the desired objectives.
The Navy can attack as long as the Navy commands the seas. It can deliver a biological or chemical attack anywhere on that three-quarters of the Earth’s surface that’s covered by water. It’s carrier-based aircraft can strike hundreds of miles inland from any coastline and attack a large portion of an enemy’s population shipping and industrial centers. The Navy can deliver and disperse these agents in three ways, from the air, from the surface, and from below the surface.
Navy delivery and dispersion of the agents started with tests made in 1950. A rather crude spraying system was installed on a mine layer which in September of that year secretly cruised off California and sprayed some 50 gallons of biological simulant along a track two to five miles offshore. Within an hour the simulant had been carried ashore and by the width sampling tests indicated that about 48 square miles of heavily populated areas were contaminated. Had an infectious agent been used in the spray there might have been 210 thousand casualties with that experiment.
If the southeast coast of the United States were selected for a larger scale test, the rather flat terrain would be favorable to wide dispersion of wind-borne particles, but dispersion of course would depend upon the existence of the proper weather conditions. After extensive studies it was determined that a track along here from five to fifteen miles offshore should do the job.
In April 1952 the USS Tercel cruised along some 100 miles of coastline spraying 250 pounds of fluorescent tracer particles the operation lasted about eight hours. Sampling tests made throughout North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia, indicated that an area of some 20,000 square miles received these particles proving that it is possible to contaminate extremely large land areas by releasing sprays at sea under the proper weather conditions.
In an actual attack the spray would be released from either a submarine submerged to periscope depth or from an aircraft cruising at low altitude. The submarine operation experimenting with mines has been carried out which is significant in this type of warfare.
The mine used was similar to the Mark 10-3, which the submarine service is accustomed to. If the mine provided spaces for biological simulant compressed air it also incorporated timing devices for releasing the mine from its mooring and for starting the Sprague. Action trials were held at Key West Florida in April 1952. Seven of these mines were laid. The trials demonstrated that the Navy has a powerful offensive weapon for biological warfare.
Here are the principles involved. As the submarine approaches a coastal area target it lays these mines filled with biological agents. The mines sink to the bottom and remain inactive for a predetermined time while the submarine escapes, then at a preset time the main portion of each mine detaches itself from the boring and rises to the surface and sprays its contents into the air to be carried ashore by the wind. The Keywest trials show the feasibility of using this type of mine for contaminating coastal areas, and inland areas can be brought under biological attack by laying similar lines from aircraft in bays and inland waterways.
Other tests have been conducted to determine the best application of this type of warfare in an amphibious operation. A spray tank has been designed for towing behind a swimmer. These swimmers may be discharged through torpedo tubes of submerged submarines, or they may be dropped overboard close to shore, and would tow the tank to a point near the beach. While this test tank was manually operated, future developments will provide a time delay and automatic release of the spray while the swimmer escapes. Under the right weather conditions the aerosol will be carried in land over the proposed amphibious attack area. Plans for amphibious operations would of course take into consideration the incubation period of the biological agent. The Navy has given considerable attention to the dissemination of agents from the air. Any Navy or Marine plane that can carry a bomb can be provided with spray equipment. The auxiliary fuel tanks on attack type aircraft can be converted to anti crop spray tanks by adding an electric pump a nozzle and a venturi. This assembly has been designated the Aero x2.
Spray equipment from aircraft using the Aero x2a has proved very effective in field trials. Another development has been the design of the Aero x-14, a all-purpose spray tank. This tank can be used for disseminating all types of agents. Extensive tests using the f7f as the carrier has shown that it works especially well at high speeds, and can be used on jet aircraft such as the up 9f panther and the f2h banshee. Future plans of this – time for larger planes, the Air Force has perfected spray equipment, this b-17 has several spraying nozzles and carries the tank in the bomb bay, the same equipment has been installed in a c-47 and has performed satisfactorily. The equipment is such that it can be installed in any plane with a bomb bay such as the Navy’s p2v or similar land-based planes, or flying boats. Morris is the first model of an air launched missile developed by the Navy specifically for biological or chemical warfare called the Gorgon 5. It’s a program preset missile with guiding mechanism mounted in the nose, and a arrow 14 tank will be mounted here in the midsection. Spray will be internal through a plane, from the tail section, which also contains the control surfaces and operating mechanisms fully loaded. The missile weighs 2,400 pounds and can be flown from the deck of a carrier. When released the missile will follow a glide path of about 15 degrees to a predetermined low altitude where it will automatically level out and spray at a preset position launched from a carrier several hundred miles at sea. Planes carrying the Gorgon find approach at about 35,000 feet, and release their missiles about 20 miles from the target. This altitude minimizes interception and the range is well beyond anti-aircraft fire. The Gorgon fires would then glide to the target and automatically spray their contents over the predetermined area before destroying themselves.
Another weapon that is also being considered is the Regulus. It is a long-range guided missile, surface launched, jet-propelled and electronically guided. Launched from a submarine or a ship at sea this missile would fly a tank of agent over the target area and automatically disseminate it. Regulus is still in the developmental stage and its adaptation to biological and chemical warfare is something for the future.
At present the Navy’s plans for the use of projectiles for this type of warfare are confined to dispersion of chemical agents for it ships. The Navy has, or will have, a variety of gas filled projectiles. The 5-inch 38 caliber, the 5-inch 50, or the 6-inch 47, the 8-inch 55, and the 5-inch spin-stabilized rocket. In addition the Marines now have chemical munitions for the 4.2 inch mortar, the 155-millimeter howitzer, and the 105 millimeter howitzer. Within the near future they will have chemical munitions for the 155 millimeter gun and the 4.5 inch rock.
We have seen what the Navy will be able to do in waging biological and chemical warfare. We will now see how the Navy plans to defend itself against this type of attack. The Navy’s defense includes the standard defensive measures against air and surface attack. In addition the Navy will provide its own combat personnel with protection available to the joint services, such as protective clothing, gas masks, and immunization. Some of the special protective devices developed by the Navy which can be used for biological and chemical defense are the ship’s water curtain, or shower, that is used to minimize contamination by washing deadly agents overboard. As soon as the spray touches the ship’s services an electrostatic precipitator cleans contaminated air by passing it through a charged field and depositing the charged infectious particles onto grounded flakes resulting in clean air at sea. Of course the motility and maneuverability of the Navy ships under the command of its experienced and well-trained personnel is one of the Navy’s best defenses against biological or chemical attack.
The Navy’s plans and programs are directed toward the goal of attaining at the earliest possible date an adequate defense, and to be ready to strike back with a most powerful counter-attack that the Navy is capable of. Delivering from the air, from the sea, from under the sea, and from Marine Forces.
US Navy Offensive Biological Warfare “Training” Video Is Beyond Shocking